Aggregator
CVE-2024-11980 (CVSS 10):十亿电动路由器中的严重缺陷
Datadog Cloud SIEM accelerates security investigations
Datadog announced its modern approach to Cloud SIEM, which doesn’t require dedicated staff or specialized teams to activate the solution. This approach makes it easy for teams to onboard, de-risk migrations and democratize security practices while disrupting traditional models, which can be costly and resource intensive. Existing SIEM (security information and event management) solutions face several significant challenges that put security teams at risk. Traditional SIEMs often struggle to integrate data from diverse sources, leading … More →
The post Datadog Cloud SIEM accelerates security investigations appeared first on Help Net Security.
A Guide to Securing AI App Development: Join This Cybersecurity Webinar
If You Only Have 1 Minute: Quick Tips for Effective Exposure Response
Comprehensive, action-oriented workflows and key metrics are the cornerstones of a successful exposure response program. Here’s what you need to know.
In today’s fast-paced digital landscape, managing vulnerabilities is essential — but it’s about more than identifying weaknesses. Effective vulnerability management requires prioritizing and addressing risks in ways that drive security improvements and prevent major exposures.
Exposure response strategies support this goal, delivering workflows that go beyond traditional risk scoring, enabling teams to prioritize vulnerabilities, set goals and track service level agreements (SLAs) by owner — ensuring a true end-to-end remediation process. Tracking progress by SLA compliance rather than by cumulative risk scores or vulnerability counts ensures accountability.
The golden metrics for exposure response workflowsEffective exposure response focuses on three "golden metrics" that every remediation workflow should track for maximum impact:
- Vulnerability age: This is the age of your unresolved vulnerabilities.
- Mean time to remediate (MTTR): Measures how long your vulnerabilities remain open.
- Percentage of vulnerabilities remediated: Reflects the scope of remediation efforts and the team’s overall effectiveness.
Tracking these indicators is essential for prioritizing and resolving vulnerabilities that matter most.
For a deeper dive, watch the video below, where we break down each metric’s importance in exposure response workflows.
Learn moreIf You Only Have 2 Minutes: Best Practices for Setting Exposure Response SLAs
Keeping vulnerability management efforts focused on achievable goals is key to avoiding cybersecurity team burnout. Here’s how exposure response workflows and SLAs can help.
As organizations grow in the digital age, vulnerability management has become a vital cybersecurity practice. But managing vulnerabilities effectively means more than just identifying potential issues; it’s about setting priorities that align with your organization’s goals and resources. A robust exposure response program elevates this process by creating comprehensive, actionable workflows that prioritize based on real-world impact rather than just risk scores or vulnerability counts. This approach shifts vulnerability management from a reactive scramble into a proactive, sustainable strategy, driven by clear accountability and performance metrics.
Exposure response workflows help teams prioritize risks based on impact and urgency. But prioritizing isn’t enough on its own — effective exposure response requires a practical approach to execution, which is where service level agreements (SLAs) make the difference.
Setting the pace: How SLAs guide effective exposure responseA crucial part of exposure response is establishing SLAs. Unlike traditional methods that rely on cumulative risk scores or vulnerability counts, SLA-based workflows measure performance by individual campaigns and specific accountability metrics. This approach prevents “learned helplessness,” where constant urgency can overwhelm teams and make the workload feel insurmountable.
Managing SLAs for achievable goalsSLAs help teams focus on attainable goals by defining what ‘critical’ or ‘high’ means based on your organization’s risk appetite, using Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) or Tenable Vulnerability Priority Rating (VPR) score ranges as benchmarks. This approach reduces the count of past-due critical and high vulnerabilities to zero instead of attempting to fix every issue at once — even if not every vulnerability is resolved immediately.
Moreover, SLAs offer flexibility for specific needs. Industry requirements, such as Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI-DSS) compliance, may necessitate stricter SLAs for certain areas. Exposure Response in Tenable Vulnerability Management allows teams to set customized SLAs in these contexts without disrupting the overall program.
Moving forward with exposure responseBy establishing realistic SLAs, teams can maintain focus and ensure that critical vulnerabilities are addressed promptly, preventing chaos and inefficiency.
For a deeper dive into these concepts, check out the video below.
Learn moreSmokeLoader Malware Resurfaces, Targeting Manufacturing and IT in Taiwan
Battling the Emotional Toxicity Within Games: How to Digitally Thrive
Battling the Emotional Toxicity Within Games: How to Digitally Thrive
If You Only Have 3 Minutes: Key Elements of Effective Exposure Response
Learned helplessness and lack of prioritization are two vulnerability management pitfalls cybersecurity teams face. Here’s how an exposure response program can help.
In today’s complex cybersecurity landscape, effective vulnerability management is crucial. Organizations are bombarded with a staggering volume of vulnerabilities every month, and traditional methods often fall short. They tend to just identify issues without offering a sustainable way to tackle them.
Enter exposure response. This approach transforms how teams prioritize, remediate and manage vulnerabilities. Instead of overwhelming teams, exposure response workflows empower them to focus on the most critical threats to their cybersecurity posture.
Why should you care? Here are some common pitfalls organizations face:
- Learned helplessness: Teams can become paralyzed by the sheer number of vulnerabilities, leading to inaction.
- Emergency mode: When every vulnerability feels urgent, it becomes impossible to prioritize effectively.
Exposure response workflows address these challenges head-on. By leveraging Service Level Agreements (SLAs), teams can maintain focus and drive measurable progress. This shift enhances security outcomes and fosters a resilient, sustainable cybersecurity strategy that adapts to evolving threats.
Why exposure response mattersExposure response programs are essential for creating a sustainable cybersecurity strategy. By implementing exposure response workflows, teams can avoid being overwhelmed by vulnerabilities.
Teams can become paralyzed by the sheer number of vulnerabilities, leading to inaction.
Instead of trying to fix every issue, they can work within SLAs to prioritize and tackle what matters most, using tools like the Tenable Vulnerability Priority Rating (VPR) and the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). This structured approach mitigates risk and empowers leaders to make data-driven decisions, enhancing their cybersecurity posture.
SLAs: The foundation of effective exposure responseSLAs are tailored deadlines reflecting organizational priorities. SLA-based workflows outperform traditional methods by enabling measurement at the campaign level, providing clearer accountability. This unique approach allows organizations to compare progress internally and against industry peers, driving continuous improvement.
When every vulnerability feels urgent, it becomes impossible to prioritize effectively.
Setting practical SLAs helps teams focus on achievable goals, such as reducing past-due vulnerabilities rather than addressing everything at once. This targeted approach not only supports compliance but also enhances the team's ability to manage workloads sustainably.
The golden metrics: Keys to a well-functioning exposure response programTracking key metrics provides an accurate assessment of exposure response effectiveness. Three “golden metrics” serve as essential indicators:
- Vulnerability age: This is the age of your unresolved vulnerabilities. Shorter ages indicate rapid identification and resolution.
- Mean time to remediate (MTTR): Measures how long your vulnerabilities remain open.
- Percentage of vulnerabilities remediated: Reflects the scope of remediation efforts and the team’s overall effectiveness.
When all three metrics are favorable, the exposure response program is performing well. Detailed tracking and reporting offer clear accountability and visibility into remediation efforts, reinforcing the importance of consistent progress.
Moving forwardIncorporating exposure response into vulnerability management gives organizations a structured way to handle cybersecurity risks proactively. By focusing on SLAs and tracking critical metrics, organizations can maintain resilience against threats while fostering a sustainable, impactful security posture. For more insights, check out the accompanying video and other posts in this series.
Learn moreSmokeLoader Malware Campaign Targets Companies in Taiwan
Mozilla really wants you to set Firefox as default Windows browser
Mozilla really wants you to easily set Firefox as default Windows browser
Skyflow protects sensitive data flowing in and out of AI agents
Skyflow unveiled new capabilities for Agentic AI. These allow enterprises to build and deploy AI agents with a security and privacy trust layer with features that include protecting sensitive data flowing in and out of AI agents, auditing & logging, governance, and compliance with global and regional data protection measures. There is a new ecosystem emerging for agentic apps – built on a new AI data stack. Skyflow is announcing partnerships with Databricks, the data … More →
The post Skyflow protects sensitive data flowing in and out of AI agents appeared first on Help Net Security.
数据驱动的应用安全建设实践
Microsoft Boosts Device Security With Windows Resiliency Initiative
研究发现海洋对气候的冷却作用超过预期
CVE-2022-0332 | Moodle up to 3.11.4 h5p Activity Web Service sql injection (EDB-50700)
Radiant Logic provides continuous identity hygiene assessments via real-time streaming data
Radiant Logic announces the expansion of its central intelligence hub solution, RadiantOne, to now include Identity Observability. Building on the identity security foundation of Identity Data Management and Identity Analytics, Identity Observability allows the world’s most complex organizations to access an intuitive map of their entire identity infrastructure with 360° continuously streaming visibility, an intelligent risk collaboration hub, and seamless AI-powered risk remediation workflows. For large organizations wrestling with identity sprawl or legacy architectures, the … More →
The post Radiant Logic provides continuous identity hygiene assessments via real-time streaming data appeared first on Help Net Security.