Aggregator

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in FoxCMS 2.0.6. Affected is an unknown function of the file DataBackup.php of the component Restore Handler. The manipulation leads to path traversal. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2025-45239. The attack needs to be done within the local network. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in FoxCMS 1.2.5. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects the function delRestoreSerie. The manipulation leads to denial of service. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-45238. The attack can only be done within the local network. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Adtran 411 ONT L80.00.0011.M2. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Telnet Service. The manipulation leads to command injection. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2025-22939. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in yshopmall up to 1.9.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Image Listing Interface. The manipulation leads to sql injection. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-25426. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in FoxCMS 1.2.5. This affects the function executeCommand of the file DataBackup.php. The manipulation leads to sql injection. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-45240. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in SeaCMS 13.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin_paylog.php. The manipulation of the argument cstatus leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability was named CVE-2025-4256. The attack can be initiated remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.

A vulnerability has been found in Zorlan SkyCaiji 2.9 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects the function fileAction of the file vendor/skycaiji/app/admin/controller/Tool.php. The manipulation of the argument save_data leads to unrestricted upload. This vulnerability was named CVE-2025-1791. The attack can be initiated remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.

Late last year, security researchers made a startling discovery: Kremlin-backed disinformation campaigns were bypassing moderation on social media platforms by leveraging the same malicious advertising technology that powers a sprawling ecosystem of online hucksters and website hackers. A new report on the fallout from that investigation finds this dark ad tech industry is far more resilient and incestuous than previously known.

无论走到哪儿，安全都是业务的属性，这肯定是不变的。我比较有幸主持过应用安全、安全防护、安全运营等多个网络安全工种的工作，也参与了安全高要求客户、供应商安全的交流，看到一些安全部门常常扮演的是监管角色，但是多层级的组织架构。 就研发安全而言，业务线需要有安全人员，做业务的安全治理，扮演帮手、与业务线同甘苦共患难；公司内还要有集团级的安全团队，做安全能力输出和监管，负责集团整体安全，包括检查业务线安全状况，这样才是合理又有效的人员配置。 更多内容，可以访问： 1、SDL 100问 SDL100问：我与SDL的故事 SAST误报太高，如何解决？ SDL需要哪些人参与？ SDL如何做成平台化以及价值？ 安全SDK提供安全API是怎么做的？ 安全测试，测不出逻辑漏洞怎么办？ 如何逐步建设XAST安全测试工具？ 如何设计安全开发平台的架构和功能？ 大家都有哪些SDL运营指标？ 业务系统是否可以带漏洞上线？ SDL 71/100问：按千行代码漏洞数进行量化，如何制定指标？ 2、SDL创新实践 首发！“ 研发安全运营 ” 架构研究与实践 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全团队 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全流程 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全规范 从安全视角，看研发安全 数字化转型下研发安全痛点 一个思考：安全测试驱动产品安全？ 3、SDL最初实践 【SDL最初实践】开篇 【SDL最初实践】安全培训 【SDL最初实践】安全需求 【SDL最初实践】安全设计 【SDL最初实践】安全开发 【SDL最初实践】安全测试 【SDL最初实践】安全审核 【SDL最初实践】安全响应 4、软件供应链安全 软件供应商面临的攻防实战风险 软件供应商实战对抗十大安全举措 软件供应商攻防常规战之SDL 软件供应链投毒事件应急响应 5、安全运营实践 基于实践的安全事件简述 安全事件运营SOP：钓鱼邮件 安全事件运营SOP：网络攻击 安全事件运营SOP：蜜罐告警 安全事件运营SOP：webshell事件 安全事件运营SOP：接收漏洞事件 应急能力提升：实战应急困境与突破 应急能力提升：挖矿权限维持攻击模拟 应急能力提升：内网横向移动攻击模拟 应急能力提升：实战应急响应经验

Multiple Cloudflare services, including Workers KV, Access, WARP and the Cloudflare dashboard, experienced an outage for up to 2 hours and 28 minutes on June 12, 2025.

Security Segmentation Assessment is a new feature in Security Services Platform (SSP) 5.0 that enhances Security Intelligence by delivering a comprehensive, data-driven view of the organization’s current security posture. It not only highlights segmentation gaps but also provides actionable recommendations to harden your environment against modern threats. This capability is available with both VMware vDefend … Continued

The post Accelerating Micro-segmentation Adoption with Security Segmentation Assessment appeared first on VMware Security Blog.

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda AC6 15.03.05.16 and classified as very critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /goform/openSchedWifi. The manipulation of the argument schedStartTime/schedEndTime leads to buffer overflow. This vulnerability was named CVE-2025-46035. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in Amazon Cloud Cam up to 202212020. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to operation on a resource after expiration. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-6031. The attack needs to be done within the local network. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in AVEVA PI Connector for CygNet up to 1.6.14. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to improper validation of integrity check value. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-4418. An attack has to be approached locally. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in AVEVA PI Connector for CygNet up to 1.6.14. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-4417. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in AVEVA PI Data Archive and PI Server. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to uncaught exception. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2025-36539. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in AVEVA PI Data Archive and PI Server up to 2023. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to uncaught exception. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-44019. The attack can be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in AVEVA PI Web API up to 2023 SP1. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2025-2745. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in SinoTrack IOT PC Platform 8.3. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the component Device Management Handler. The manipulation leads to weak authentication. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2025-5484. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in SinoTrack IOT PC Platform up to 8.6. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Web Management Interface. The manipulation leads to observable response discrepancy. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-5485. The attack can be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.