Aggregator

A vulnerability was found in Linux Kernel up to 6.6.88/6.12.25/6.14.4/6.15-rc3. It has been classified as critical. Impacted is the function gicv2m_get_fwnode. This manipulation causes use after free. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2025-37819. The attack requires access to the local network. No exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in steveukx simple-git up to 3.32.2. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in os command injection. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2026-28292. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability was found in IBM Aspera Orchestrator up to 4.1.2. It has been declared as problematic. Impacted is an unknown function of the component URL Parameter Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to use of get request method with sensitive query strings. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2025-13219. The attack can be executed remotely. There is not any exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in IBM Aspera Faspex up to 5.0.14.3. Affected is an unknown function of the component Web UI. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2025-36226. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in IBM Aspera Faspex up to 5.0.14.3. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to improper neutralization of http headers for scripting syntax. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2025-36227. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in IBM Aspera Orchestrator up to 4.1.2. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation results in improper neutralization of http headers for scripting syntax. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2025-13213. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in GitHub Enterprise Server up to 3.16.14/3.17.11/3.18.5/3.19.2. This affects an unknown part of the component REST API Endpoint. The manipulation leads to missing authorization. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2026-3582. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in GetSimple CMS up to 3.3.22. This affects an unknown function of the file gsconfig.php of the component Gsconfig Editor Module. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2026-28495. The attack can be launched remotely. No exploit exists.

A vulnerability was found in GitHub Enterprise Server up to 3.18.5/3.19.2. It has been declared as problematic. The affected element is an unknown function. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2026-2266. The attack can be launched remotely. No exploit exists. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Tenda i24V3.0si 3.0.0.5. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /etc_ro/shadow. Such manipulation leads to use of hard-coded password. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2025-70798. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. No exploit is available.

A vulnerability has been found in Craft CMS up to 4.17.2/5.9.5 and classified as problematic. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /actions/preview/create-token of the component Endpoint. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2026-29113. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. The affected component should be upgraded.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Microsoft Authenticator on iOS/Android. This affects an unknown part. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper authorization in handler for custom url scheme. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-26123. The attack can only be executed locally. There is no exploit available. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

好的，我现在需要帮用户总结一篇文章的内容，控制在100字以内。用户已经提供了文章的详细内容，包括摘要、描述、参考资料、环境、用户、前提条件、步骤和影响等部分。 首先，我要理解文章的主要内容。文章讨论的是Facebook的一个功能漏洞：虽然官方文档说明只有朋友才能被添加为活动的共同主持人，但实际上在群组活动中，任何群组成员，即使不是创建者的Facebook好友，也可以被添加为共同主持人。这导致了权限分配的问题，可能带来意外的管理权限。 接下来，我需要将这些信息浓缩到100字以内。要抓住关键点：功能漏洞、官方文档与实际操作不符、群组成员可以成为共同主持人、可能引发的问题。 然后，我要确保语言简洁明了，避免使用复杂的术语。同时，不需要使用“文章内容总结”这样的开头词。 最后，检查字数是否符合要求，并确保信息准确无误。 Facebook允许群组成员成为活动共同主持人，即使他们不是创建者的Facebook好友。这与官方文档规定不符，并可能导致意外权限分配。

首批「众包申请」被一抢而空。

好的，我现在需要帮用户总结一篇文章的内容，控制在100个字以内。用户的要求是直接写文章描述，不需要以“文章内容总结”或“这篇文章”这样的开头。 首先，我仔细阅读了用户提供的文章内容。文章主要讨论了Agentic AI的安全问题，与传统的LLM相比，Agentic AI具有自主行动能力，因此面临新的安全威胁。OWASP发布了针对这两种系统的安全框架，分别指出了各自的十大风险。 接下来，我需要提炼出文章的核心要点：Agentic AI的自主性带来的新安全风险、OWASP的两个框架及其区别。然后，将这些要点浓缩成100字以内的总结。 考虑到用户可能希望了解Agentic AI相对于传统LLM的不同之处以及相关的安全挑战，我应该突出这些关键点。同时，保持语言简洁明了。 最后，确保总结直接描述文章内容，没有多余的开头或结尾。 文章探讨了Agentic AI（自主AI）与传统LLM（大型语言模型）在安全风险上的区别。传统LLM主要面临提示注入、数据中毒等风险，而Agentic AI因具备自主行动能力（如访问数据库、发送邮件、调用API），面临更复杂的威胁，包括目标劫持、工具滥用、供应链攻击、身份滥用等。OWASP分别针对两者发布了2025和2026年的十大安全风险框架。

嗯，用户让我帮忙总结这篇文章，控制在一百个字以内，而且不需要特定的开头。首先，我需要快速浏览文章内容，抓住主要信息。 文章讲的是Mercado Libre作为拉美最大的电商平台，他们最初自己开发了一个爬虫系统来抓取亚马逊的数据。但后来遇到了各种问题，比如亚马逊页面频繁变化导致爬虫失效，维护成本高，影响了他们的数据分析工作。 然后他们转向使用Bright Data的API服务，解决了这些问题，节省了时间和资源，能够专注于核心业务。所以总结的时候要突出他们从自建到使用API的转变以及带来的好处。 接下来我要确保语言简洁明了，控制在100字以内。可能需要提到他们最初遇到的问题、解决方案以及结果。 最后检查一下有没有遗漏关键点，比如维护成本高、影响数据分析、使用API后的效率提升等。 Mercado Libre作为拉美最大电商平台曾自建爬虫抓取亚马逊数据，但因页面频繁变化导致维护困难。后转用Bright Data API实现稳定抓取，节省资源并专注核心业务。

好的，我现在需要帮用户总结一篇文章的内容，控制在100字以内。用户的要求是直接写文章描述，不需要以“文章内容总结”之类的开头。 首先，我仔细阅读了用户提供的文章。这篇文章主要讨论了解读肢体语言的重要性，并提供了几个关键的建议和见解。文章提到，肢体语言不是一门精确的科学，需要结合情境来理解。 接下来，我注意到文章中提到了几个关键点：群体手势、基线行为、情境的重要性、以及一些具体的肢体语言线索，比如眼神、手臂和手部动作、脚的位置、身体姿势等。此外，文章还推荐了一些书籍和在线资源，并强调了练习和观察的重要性。 为了确保总结在100字以内，我需要提炼出这些要点的核心内容。首先，指出解读肢体语言的重要性，并说明它不是精确的科学。然后提到关键点：群体手势、基线行为和情境因素。接着列举一些具体的肢体语言线索，如眼神接触、交叉手臂、脚的方向等。最后，提到通过练习可以提高解读能力。 现在将这些内容整合成一个连贯的句子，确保不超过100字，并且直接描述文章内容。 解读肢体语言能更好地理解他人，但需结合情境分析。关键包括观察群体手势而非单一动作、了解个人基线行为以及考虑文化背景等因素。具体线索包括眼神接触、交叉手臂、脚的方向及身体姿势等。通过实践和学习资源可提升解读能力。

Handala Hack использует Starlink и ИИ, но по старинке удаляет файлы через «Корзину».

嗯，用户让我用中文帮他总结这篇文章，控制在一百个字以内。首先，我需要仔细阅读文章内容。文章讲的是Tinder推出了一个叫“化学反应”的新功能，用人工智能来帮助用户配对。Tinder强调他们的经典滑动机制还是核心，但AI会带来更个性化的体验。CEO提到AI会推荐更相关的连接，并提高安全标准。AI会从用户的个人资料中学习，了解性格、感觉和重要的事情。 接下来，我要把重点提炼出来：Tinder测试新功能“化学反应”，用AI配对，保持滑动机制为核心，提升个性化和安全性。然后，我需要把这些信息浓缩到100字以内，确保语言简洁明了。 可能的结构是：Tinder测试新功能“化学反应”，利用AI推荐更相关配对，同时保持滑动机制核心，提升个性化和安全性。 检查一下字数是否符合要求，确保没有超过限制。最后，确认总结准确反映了文章的主要内容。 Tinder测试新功能"化学反应"，利用人工智能推荐更相关配对，同时保持滑动机制为核心，提升个性化和安全性。

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Ivanti DSM up to 2026.1. This vulnerability affects unknown code. This manipulation causes exposed dangerous routine. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2026-3483. The attack is restricted to local execution. No exploit exists. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.