Aggregator

本文是团队成员N0b1e6的原创技术文章！正文开始-----------------------------

This post is part of a series about machine learning and artificial intelligence. Click on the blog tag “huskyai” to see related posts. Overview: How Husky AI was built, threat modeled and operationalized Attacks: Some of the attacks I want to investigate, learn about, and try out I wanted to explore the “Adversarial Robustness Toolbox” (ART) for a while to understand how it can be used to create adversarial examples for Husky AI.

Get Around the Cybersecurity Skills Gap by Nurturing Cyberdefenders Within Your Own Organization

本报告部分引自Week in OSINT栏目，每周推荐好玩实用的工具，站点，技巧，文章等，适用于任何领域的研究人员，分析测试人员。

本报告部分引自Week in OSINT栏目，每周推荐好玩实用的工具，站点，技巧，文章等，适用于任何领域的研究人员，分析测试人员。

本报告部分引自Week in OSINT栏目，每周推荐好玩实用的工具，站点，技巧，文章等，适用于任何领域的研究人员，分析测试人员。

For GrayHat 2020 I was asked to create a short intro video for my Red Team Village talk “Learning by doing: Building and breaking a machine learning system”. So I put my green screen to good use and recorded this short clip for Red Team Village. Here is the link to the clip on Twitter: Hope you like it. :) The talk will be October, 31st 2020. Schedule: http://redteamvillage.io/schedule Grayhat’s website: http://grayhat.

好朋友安全客2020年度第3季季刊发布，快来阅读

在使用脱壳机对Android App脱壳的时候，我们常常会得到有nop指令填充的函数的dex，nop是No Operation的缩写，意为无操作。

在刚刚结束的N1CTF中, 我出了一道很简短的域渗透题目, 其中第三关个人感觉比较有意思, 单独抽出来分享一下.

在刚刚结束的N1CTF中, 我出了一道很简短的域渗透题目, 其中第三关个人感觉比较有意思, 单独抽出来分享一下.

在刚刚结束的N1CTF中, 我出了一道很简短的域渗透题目, 其中第三关个人感觉比较有意思, 单独抽出来分享一下.

在刚刚结束的N1CTF中, 我出了一道很简短的域渗透题目, 其中第三关个人感觉比较有意思, 单独抽出来分享一下.

在刚刚结束的N1CTF中, 我出了一道很简短的域渗透题目, 其中第三关个人感觉比较有意思, 单独抽出来分享一下.

在刚刚结束的N1CTF中, 我出了一道很简短的域渗透题目, 其中第三关个人感觉比较有意思, 单独抽出来分享一下.

在刚刚结束的N1CTF中, 我出了一道很简短的域渗透题目, 其中第三关个人感觉比较有意思, 单独抽出来分享一下.

As the go-to enterprise distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) mitigation experts, our phones have been "ringing off the hook" since the release of the global extortion DDoS campaign sequel. This latest installment of the cybersecurity saga is bigger, badder, and features a broader cast of criminal characters than seen previously with last year's extortion-related activity.

There is a lot of discussion around terms such as red team, attack team, pentest, adversarial engineering or offensive security team and similar ones. I typically stay away from the (sometimes passionate) discussions that ensue whenever this topic comes up. Personally, I think a good strategy is to define programs and teams who operate in this space by what services the team (or teams) provide(s) to the organization. The business groups, blue team, developers, engineers, employees and clients are the customers.

If the title sounds like a trick question, it really depends on who you ask. Semantically, it seems clear that if you take the "edge" and combine it with "computing" you get edge computing. But if you have been reading headlines, you would be justified in having doubts that the answer is that simple.