Aggregator

4 тревожных признака и проверенные методы защиты.

A vulnerability was found in Google Chrome up to 73. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Blink Storage. The manipulation as part of HTML Page leads to integer overflow. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2019-5788. The attack may be initiated remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

近期发现某国内的黑客团伙用0889.org作为恶意样本地址和通信域名，后面简称0889组织。最近一次排查某云上阅读更多

近期发现某国内的黑客团伙用0889.org作为恶意样本地址和通信域名，后面简称0889组织。最近一次排查某云上挖矿的case，发现该组织通过jenkins RCE漏洞突破边界，内网横向

Every week seems to bring news of another data breach, and it’s no surprise why: securing sensitive data has become harder than ever. And it’s not just because companies are dealing with orders of magnitude more data. Data flows and user roles are constantly shifting, and data is stored across multiple technologies and cloud environments. Not to mention, compliance requirements are only getting

Преступная схема работала под прикрытием легального гостиничного бизнеса.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Textpattern 4.4.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument ddb leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2011-5019. The attack can be launched remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.

CIA analysts Asif William Rahman has pleaded guilty to sharing classified documents about an Israeli attack

A vulnerability was found in Epic Games Unreal Tournament 2003 2225 Win32. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file manifest.ini of the component Manifest. The manipulation leads to path traversal. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2004-1958. The attack may be launched remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.

Hey everyone, I’m currently trying to balance my cybersecurity learning between sol

从正常商业逻辑来说，“回头客”本应享有消费优惠，但在“大数据杀熟”之下，老用户不仅享受不到优惠，甚至价格更高。“大数据杀熟”对相同商品或服务予以差别化定价，这是对消费者公平交易权的侵犯，是对民法典中公平原则、诚实信用原则的违反。