Aggregator

你可能错过的新鲜事英伟达发布 RTX 50 系显卡1月6日，英伟达在 CES 2025 上发布 RTX 50 系列显卡，搭载 Blackwell 架构，支持 DLSS 4 和升级版帧生成技术，其中 R

引  言在数字化转型的浪潮中，工业领域正经历着前所未有的变革与创新。随着智能制造、工业互联网等新兴技术的蓬勃发展，工业系统的复杂性和互联性日益增强，这为工业生产带来了前所未有的效率与灵活性。然而，与此

揭示三大标准在保障工业网络安全方面的异同与优劣。

Besieged by scammers seeking to phish user accounts over the telephone, Apple and Google frequently caution that they will never reach out unbidden to users this way. However, new details about the internal operations of a prolific voice phishing gang show the group routinely abuses legitimate services at Apple and Google to force a variety of outbound communications to their users, including emails, automated phone calls and system-level messages sent to all signed-in devices.

This daily article is intended to make it easier for those who want to stay updated with my regular Dark Web Informer and X/Twitter posts.

The deal will enhance 1Password Extended Access Management offering with capabilities to address challenges around software-as-a-service sprawl and shadow IT.

Explore the invisible war being fought in cyberspace, where nations battle without traditional weapons. This comprehensive guide explains modern cyberattacks, their impact on global security, and how countries defend their digital borders in an increasingly connected world.

The post The Digital Battlefield: Understanding Modern Cyberattacks and Global Security appeared first on Security Boulevard.

TAO

Until September 2024, the encrypted messaging service acceded to 14 requests for user data from the US; that number jumped to 900 after its CEO was detained by French authorities in August.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.3.5/8.3.7. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Outside In Technology. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability was named CVE-2012-1772. An attack has to be approached locally. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

A vulnerability was found in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.3.7. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the component Outside In Technology. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2012-1768. Local access is required to approach this attack. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.3.5/8.3.7. This affects an unknown part of the component Outside In Technology. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2012-1771. The attack needs to be approached locally. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

A vulnerability was found in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.3.5/8.3.7 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Outside In Technology. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2012-1767. An attack has to be approached locally. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in glFTPD up to 1.23. This affects an unknown part of the component Command Handler. The manipulation of the argument LIST with the input *** leads to denial of service. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2001-0965. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A Threat Actor Claims to be Selling a WordPress Exploit Tool

为了说清楚问题，先介绍一下提出问题的背景：已经要求业务方进行安全测试，并且有较为完善的机制与流程保障其正常运转。但由于安全检测工具不全都“友好”的支持自动化接入研发流程，故而产生该问题。 回到问题本身，建议从给业务方带来的好处来谈，安全检测工具如DAST（系统/web/容器）等能力开放给业务方，会对其带来更大的便利。比如： 1、有来自客户的安全需求时，要进行扫描并提交报告，此时不需要安全团队帮助、自己就能做； 2、在提交安全测试前，业务方先完成自检或将工具接入自己研发流程SOP（手动触发扫描也算），然后再送检，能够提升发版速度。 随之而来的也会有一些麻烦，比如增大安全工具运营成本、扫描范围不可控等问题，不过都有解、且好处是大于坏处的，所以这事儿就值得持续干下去。 更多软件安全内容，可以访问： 1、SDL100问：我与SDL的故事 SAST误报太高，如何解决？ SDL需要哪些人参与？ 设计阶段应开展哪些安全活动？ 如何选择开源组件安全扫描(SCA)工具？ SCA工具扫描出很多漏洞，如何处理？ SCA工具识别出高风险协议，如何处理？ 应该如何选型代码安全扫描工具？ 如何推进有问题的jar包更新？ SCA工具的误报率怎样？ 如何说服业务完成checklist自检？ sdl会对项目变更代码做review吗？ 怎么解决源代码两张皮导致安全失效？ 开发安全培训是否有效？ 安全组件如何在SDL中落地？ 如何安全管理研发提交代码到GitHub进行开源？ 安全组件(SDK)能够否覆盖Owasp Top 10? SDL建设是难中难，该如何做？ 如何定位及落地威胁建模？ 关于安全测试标准化的讨论？ SDL是否适合互联网公司？ SDL 50/100问：有什么SDL相关的评价体系？ 2、SDL创新实践系列 首发！“ 研发安全运营 ” 架构研究与实践 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全团队 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全流程 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全规范 从安全视角，看研发安全 数字化转型下的研发安全痛点