Aggregator

The FishMonger APT Group has been linked with I-SOON, targeting governments, NGOs and think tanks in cyber-espionage campaigns

In this guest blog post, learn the basics on how to build and maintain an effective AWS security posture leveraging various best practices.

The post How to Build and Maintain an Effective AWS Security Posture appeared first on SentinelOne.

The UK's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) has published specific timelines on migrating to post-quantum cryptography (PQC), dictating that critical organizations should complete migration by 2035. [...]

AI Security Architect Verizon | USA | Hybrid – View job details As an AI Security Architect, you will ensure security architecture reviews are integrated into Verizon’s AI development lifecycle. This includes embedding robust security measures from design to deployment, conducting risk assessments on AI models, and implementing security tools and protocols in AI/ML operations. Application Penetration Tester – Cyber Security Supervisor RSM US LLP | USA | Hybrid – View job details As an … More →

The post Cybersecurity jobs available right now in the USA: March 20, 2025 appeared first on Help Net Security.

基于多步过滤与污点分析的可扩展的克隆漏洞检测 by ourren

更多最新文章，请访问SecWiki

Protecting your cloud environment for the long term involves choosing a security partner whose priorities align with your needs. Here's what you need to know.

As organizations embrace multi-cloud and hybrid environments, the complexity of securing that landscape increases. However, the overlooked risks may not come solely from threat actors. Choosing a security provider that has conflicting priorities can also introduce risk. The best cloud security program is built on independence, transparency and aligned priorities around your security needs. Here are five critical considerations for choosing the right security provider to protect your organization — and your cloud strategy — for the long term.

1. Checks and balances are essential

Your cloud security provider should be your second set of eyes — not the same entity responsible for your infrastructure. You lose critical checks and balances when your cloud provider is also your security vendor. No company can be entirely impartial when tasked with policing itself. Keeping security independent from infrastructure ensures risks aren’t overlooked because they conflict with a cloud service provider’s product roadmap, revenue model or strategic priorities.

2. Visibility is power — be careful who you give it to

Many security vendors see everything — your configurations, vulnerabilities and even metadata about how you use various cloud services. That visibility is necessary for protection but can become a competitive lever in the wrong hands. Ask yourself: does this vendor have other lines of business that benefit from knowing how I operate — for example, do they compete in cloud infrastructure, data services or AI/machine learning platforms? Your cloud security provider should be focused solely on protecting you — not gathering intelligence that could inform sales strategies elsewhere on how to upsell you.

3. Priorities shift — will yours still matter?

Many cloud security platforms promise broad, multi-cloud support, but priorities change. What happens when future product development leans toward one specific cloud environment? Will integrations with your preferred platforms lag? Will support or feature enhancements begin favoring certain clouds over others? Choose a partner whose roadmap aligns with your needs — not one that might shift with changing corporate objectives.

4. Plan for portability — don’t get trapped

The cloud is dynamic, and change is difficult and expensive for organizations. Don’t commit to a vendor that locks you into a specific cloud ecosystem or makes it costly to adapt as your business evolves. The best partners enable flexibility. They make it easy to scale, shift or change providers without risking your security posture — or budget.

5. Securing the cloud means more than just “cloud security”

The time for solutions that are solely focused on cloud security is coming to an end. As security threats continue to evolve, exposure management — which requires understanding business risk across all facets of the organization — should be the goal. Any security product that you adopt must be flexible enough to fit into your broader exposure management strategy. Additionally, most large organizations are operating a hybrid cloud environment, which requires visibility into the entire attack surface. As we all know, threat actors know no boundaries — all your bases must be covered — from cloud to operational technology to clients and more.

What the right cloud security provider looks like

When evaluating cloud security vendors, prioritize those who are: 

• Truly cloud-agnostic — no ownership or influence from any cloud provider
• Focused solely on security, not selling you infrastructure
• Research and security innovators, with an established track record
• Equipped to protect multi-cloud and hybrid environments equally well
• Transparent about product roadmaps and priorities
• Committed to your long-term flexibility and control

Cloud security is too important to entrust to anyone whose priorities aren’t fully aligned with yours. Choose independence. Choose neutrality. Choose a partner whose only job is to protect you — wherever your cloud strategy takes you next.

A vulnerability was found in Inflectra SpiraTeam 7.2.00. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-48591. The attack can be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in flatpressblog flatpress 1.3. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2024-9847. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability was found in mudler localai up to 2.21.x and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to misinterpretation of input. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-9900. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability has been found in Luxion KeyShot and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component USDC File Parser. The manipulation leads to use after free. This vulnerability was named CVE-2025-2532. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Luxion KeyShot. This affects an unknown part of the component DAE File Parser. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-2531. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Luxion KeyShot. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component DAE File Parser. The manipulation leads to uninitialized pointer. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2025-2530. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.

YouTube videos promoting game cheats are being used to deliver a previously undocumented stealer malware called Arcane likely targeting Russian-speaking users. "What's intriguing about this malware is how much it collects," Kaspersky said in an analysis. "It grabs account information from VPN and gaming clients, and all kinds of network utilities like ngrok, Playit, Cyberduck, FileZilla, and

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in open-webui up to up to 0.3.8. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-7035. The attack can be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in parisneo lollms-webui up to 9.8. Affected is an unknown function of the component Settings Page. The manipulation of the argument full_template leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2024-6986. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in FlatPress up to 1.2. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component xsig File Handler. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-4023. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability was found in automatic1111 stable-diffusion-webui. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component HTML File Handler. The manipulation leads to HTML injection. This vulnerability was named CVE-2024-12374. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in flatpressblog flatpress 1.3. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-9699. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability was found in langgenius dify up to 0.12.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2024-11824. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.